Jump to content
  • Detailed search options are for members only and depend on your membership level.

  • Popular Tags

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'planning'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Discussions & Forums

  • Recent Discussions & Forums
    • Strategy & change
    • Data & analytics
    • Integrated planning
    • E2E orchestration
    • Member Q&A

Calendars

  • Strategy & change
  • Data & analytics
  • Integrated planning
  • E2E orchestration
  • INTENT Live Meetings

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Found 6 results

  1. until
    Even if you are very focused on a specific project or focus of supply chain enablement, it's important to see this in the context of a broader digitalisation roadmap. In the interdependent context of supply chain, it's vital to see the dependencies and to understand the target outcomes. In this discussion we explore how to visualise, position, and set a roadmap in place for success, ensuring outcomes meet objectives and avoiding missteps. For this discussion we' draw on expertise from SAP experts Olivehorse, and will involve a range of businesses looking at either wholesale transformation or s
  2. until
    The disconnect between plans and reality often undermine confidence in the effectiveness of planning processes. One of the main causes of this disconnect is latency in decision-making: the time between an event being detected (or predicted) and action being taken. This discussion will explore how this gap can be closed using an integrated business planning and execution framework which can realise value from investments in IoT and AI. Discussion Partner: AGENDA IBPX: closing the gap between planning and execution Identifying principle causes of latency, including l
  3. Summary of a discussion on 11th March with members from General Mills, Atlas Copco, Corbion, Aston Martin, Unilever, Alstom, GSK focusing on an implementation of concurrent led by Ayse Gul at British American Tobacco with Alexis Rotenberg of Kinaxis. What participants wanted to improve about their current planning processes Visibility and responsiveness to demand and supply volatility i.e. agility Scenario modelling capability including financial impacts Data-driven decisions Integration of planning & execution Key takeaways Concurrent p
  4. DRAFT AGENDA S&OE - S&OP: balancing short- and longer-term planning horizons What works best in terms of synchronising cycles and managing information exchange between them? Best practice for roles & responsibilities, inc. when not possible to have distinct teams ABOUT INTENT DISCUSSIONS All discussions are private, held under the Chatham House Rule and moderated by INTENT with approx. 6-8 participants for 45-90 mins of candid, interactive discussion (not a passive webinar) Some discussions include subject matter experts fr
  5. DRAFT AGENDA Integrating external / big data for planning Dealing with volatility and compromised value of historical data Identifying reliable external data sources: customers, suppliers, indices, data providers...? Integrating, harmonising and harnessing external data into planning systems and processes ABOUT INTENT DISCUSSIONS All discussions are private, held under the Chatham House Rule and moderated by INTENT with approx. 6-8 participants for 45-90 mins of candid, interactive discussion (not a passive webinar) Some
  6. DRAFT AGENDA Continuous / concurrent / non-sequential planning Volatility driving the need for shorter planning cycles and greater agility Aligning data so that a change in one attribute cascades across the rest of the supply chain in real time On demand scenario modelling Closing planning & execution gaps ABOUT INTENT DISCUSSIONS All discussions are private, held under the Chatham House Rule and moderated by INTENT with approx. 6-8 participants for 45-90 mins of candid, interactive discussion (not a passive w
×
×
  • Create New...